WORD COUNT: 156
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Outside Activity 5
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Movie vs. Text
WORD COUNT: 200
Outside Activity 4
WORD COUNT: 173
Monday, November 9, 2009
The Barmaid Tells the Story
WORD COUNT: 245
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Teenage Wasteland
WORD COUNT: 208
Monday, November 2, 2009
Parker's Back Reflection
When O.E. marries Sarah Ruth, he is not religious. Whether he believed in God and chose not to act on it or did not believe at all, the reader does not know. The reader, however, does know that he is black and has covered his body in tattoos except for his back. I think it is important that he has nothing on his back and the reason for it. He thinks that there is not a reason to have a tattoo on his back because he cannot see it. If he did want to see it he would have to position himself between two mirrors and he thinks that he would look like an idiot looking for the tattoo.
At the end of the story, O.E. has a major revelation when he gets the tattoo of Christ on his back. This image of Christ is a symbol of his revelation about religion. I found it interesting because the reason he did not have a tattoo there was because he could not see it, just as he cannot see Christ. I also liked that he found the eyes the most intriguing part. His back is the most appropriate place for this image as well. Although he cannot see Christ, Christ is always watching and observing what we do. The other reason he did not get a tattoo there was because he would look like an idiot trying to see it. This goes along well with how his friends questioned him about getting religion and made him feel stupid.
This story is a lesson to me that although not everyone may believe in the Lord, they may in time and in different ways. Not everyone has to come to Christ at the same time or the same way. Parker’s Back had many opposing characters that combined in some way to benefit the protagonist O.E.
WORK COUNT: 378
Outside Activity 3
I really enjoyed this play a lot. The acting was very good and so was the image behind it. After discussing it with my boyfriend on the way home, he brought up a very good question that made me reflect on society. How many jury committees rush through a trial because they have other things to do? I found this very interesting, because it would be easier for someone to just agree with a group in order to move on, especially when you do not know the person being effected by your decision. I admired the woman juror who stood up for her beliefs. She did not have a reason to doubt the guilt but wanted to discuss it any way. If she had not than they would not have found out that the victim was not guilty. The behavior of the other jurors and their motives make me question how we run things in courts. Who is to say that this does not happen? Most people dread getting letters for jury duty any way. You never hear someone who got jury duty say, "Yeah! Now I get to go spend days in a court room listening and being quite."
WORD COUNT: 240
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)